INSIGHTS
By
Kris Wild,
Chief Investment Officer
Dec 3, 2023
As markets rally on tech giants and fiscal stimulus, a deepening dislocation raises critical questions about systemic risks, fiscal sustainability, and the future of economic resilience.
Dislocation Remains a Frustrating Theme for Financial Markets
The financial markets continue to grapple with a stark dislocation. The benchmark S&P 500 has rallied nearly 20% year to date, driven by a handful of technology giants, while the average and median stocks in the index lag significantly. This concentrated performance is even more pronounced in the Nasdaq 100 Index, up almost 45% this year, compared to the modest gains of the Russell 2000 (up about 5%) and the Dow Jones Industrials (up about 9%).
The Hope for a Broader Market Recovery
Much of this year’s economic resilience carried the expectation that the recovery would extend from dominant tech leaders to smaller-cap stocks and other economically sensitive sectors. However, despite a year-end rally fueled by hopes of lower interest rates and a soft landing, the disparity between tech’s dominance and the rest of the market persists. This highlights a significant dislocation between the over-owned tech giants and the neglected stocks across other indices.
Why the Dislocation Persists
A soft landing should, in theory, lift all boats, but the market continues to favor a few large-cap tech shares. While this concentration in tech isn’t necessarily irrational, historical patterns suggest such imbalances rarely sustain. The absence of a rotation into lagging sectors underscores skepticism about the broader economic resilience and the viability of a soft-landing narrative.
Systemic Risks Heading Into 2024
The persistence of this dislocation suggests the safety trade into big tech reflects growing concerns about systemic risk. Earlier this year, consensus forecasts predicted a 2023 recession, driven by the lagged effects of interest rate hikes, with recovery anticipated in late 2024. However, unexpected fiscal stimulus and liquidity injections from the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve offset these tightening measures, averting recession but selectively benefiting markets.
Fiscal Profligacy and Market Narrowness
While Treasury markets have shown improvement, term premiums still highlight fiscal concerns. The equity market’s narrow performance suggests that fiscal largesse is not trickling into the broader economy. Instead, smaller stocks and many industries remain sidelined, reflecting skepticism about the sustainability of fiscal-driven economic support.
The Role of Short-Term Funding Pools
The government’s fiscal borrowing in 2023 primarily drew from excess funds in money markets, which have declined from $2.5 trillion to about $800 billion. If these funds are fully depleted, the Treasury may need to source financing from longer-duration money pools or private sector reserves. This risk of “crowding out” private sector investments could exacerbate the equity market’s dislocation.
The Importance of Financial Plumbing
While the drain on short-term funding poses risks, monetary authorities typically step in to maintain financial stability at all costs. Quantitative Easing (QE) serves as the primary tool for this, underwriting fiscal debt servicing and providing liquidity for refinancing private debts.
The Consequences of QE and Policy Distortions
While QE tends to lift financial assets, the gains are often driven by monetary inflation, reducing real returns. This inflation remains confined to asset markets, failing to benefit the broader economy. The ongoing dislocation between big tech and the rest of the market highlights the distortion created by such policies, leaving most sectors outside of tech struggling to catch up.
Disclosure:
© 2025 Morningstar, Inc. All rights reserved. The Morningstar Rating™ is for the Class A only; other classes may have different performance characteristics. The rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold the fund. Morningstar does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness and is not responsible for damages or losses arising from any use of this information.
Investors should consider the Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses before investing. The prospectus, containing this and other information about the Fund, should be read carefully before investing. The prospectus is available at the download icon below or by calling 800-711-9164. Current and future holdings are subject to change and risk.
Investments in the Fund are subject to investment risks, including the possible loss of some or all of the principal amount invested. There is no assurance that the Fund will be successful in meeting its investment objective. The Fund is subject to the following additional risks:
▪ Active Trading Risk: Active trading may result in added expenses, a lower return, and increased tax liability. Since the Fund’s advisor engages in high turnover trading strategies, the Fund will have high portfolio turnover rates.
▪ Closed-End Fund Risk: Closed-end funds (CEFs) are subject to investment advisory and other expenses, which will be indirectly paid by the Fund resulting in duplicative fees and expenses. CEFs are also subject to management risk because the advisor to the underlying CEF may be unsuccessful in meeting the fund’s investment objective.
▪ Equity Securities Risk: Equity securities are subject to changes in value, and their values may be more volatile than those of other asset classes. These changes in value may result from factors affecting individual issuers, industries, or the stock market.
More information about these risks can be found in the Fund's prospectus.
Vigilant Distributors, LLC., Member FINRA/SIPC. There is no affiliation between Modern Capital Management Co., including its principals, and Vigilant Distributors, LLC.
- No Bank Guarantee
- May Lose Value
- NOT FDIC-INSURED